<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round 2 of NHL Playoffs: How it&#8217;ll all pan out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cipsports.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/round-2-of-nhl-playoffs-how-itll-all-pan-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cipsports.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/round-2-of-nhl-playoffs-how-itll-all-pan-out/</link>
	<description>an editorial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Games 1 &#38; 2: Who&#8217;s shat don&#8217;t stank? &#171; Case In Point</title>
		<link>http://cipsports.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/round-2-of-nhl-playoffs-how-itll-all-pan-out/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Games 1 &#38; 2: Who&#8217;s shat don&#8217;t stank? &#171; Case In Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipsports.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] Although, this year I made an attempt at being realistic and unbiased. A lot of good it did me (see predictions for Round 2). Anyway, the Penguins and the Red Wings both lead their respective conference final series at 2-0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although, this year I made an attempt at being realistic and unbiased. A lot of good it did me (see predictions for Round 2). Anyway, the Penguins and the Red Wings both lead their respective conference final series at 2-0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
